# FluCoMa and Modular Synths

**URL:** https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/flucoma-and-modular-synths/463
**Category:** Code Sharing
**Created:** [April 24, 2020, 3:47pm UTC](https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/flucoma-and-modular-synths/463 "2020-04-24T15:47:43Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 15

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![rodrigo.constanzo](https://discourse.flucoma.org/user_avatar/discourse.flucoma.org/rodrigo.constanzo/32/12_2.png) [@rodrigo.constanzo](https://discourse.flucoma.org/u/rodrigo.constanzo)
#### Post date: [May 2, 2020, 3:08pm UTC](https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/flucoma-and-modular-synths/463/15 "2020-05-02T15:08:49Z")

</div>

> [@tremblap](#):
>
> do I detect 2 almost real compliments in 2 posts in a row? Are you ok?

Hehe, I like to keep all my sass in [one thread](https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/onset-based-regression-jit-mfcc-example/464/36) at the time… 😜

> [@tremblap](#):
>
> yeah, if you are more patient, you could mod the patch to enter 10k points of which 100 at full resolution, that should give you more precision… but i’m never that patient 😉 replacing entrymatcher with knn in there would be good, so we could check clustering too (in relation to our other thread)

Yeah the pre-training time doesn’t bother me too much. That super crude [stuff I did with a hardware patch bay a few years ago](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f0tNQBYecNo) took around 20minutes to analyze a single patch. Faster is better obviously though.

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/flucoma-and-modular-synths/463)._