# NNSize question

**URL:** https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/nnsize-question/450
**Category:** Pre-Release Toolbox2 New Ideas
**Created:** [March 31, 2020, 8:35pm UTC](https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/nnsize-question/450 "2020-03-31T20:35:20Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 27

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tremblap](https://discourse.flucoma.org/user_avatar/discourse.flucoma.org/tremblap/32/5_2.png) [@tremblap](https://discourse.flucoma.org/u/tremblap)
#### Post date: [April 2, 2020, 6:56pm UTC](https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/nnsize-question/450/27 "2020-04-02T18:56:02Z")

</div>

I agree. At the moment we are confirming the design and challenges of the building blocks of the database, as you saw, and there are plenty of things to fight against already. @tutschku is onto something for instance, and @tedmoore too. it is important that this foundation is solid, then building ML stuff on it is ‘easy’ for someone like @groma and @weefuzzy who used and abused such technologies for years… Sam’s and @tedmoore’s hybrid approaches are good too, as the scikit learn has many, many well documented methods to help thinking and prototyping forward… I’m sure you want to do all this in RT and because of that, it needs to be built on a solid foundation 😉

---

_[View the full topic](https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/nnsize-question/450)._