So the original (profoundly confusing(!))
fluid.ampslice~ was broken up into two objects in what is now known as
Certain things about it are still confusing about it to me, and for the purposes of my patch I’m combining half of the original Max-version of
fluid.ampslice~ with the tail end of
fluid.ampgate~. Doing something like this:
A bit strange that I have to go “half and half” with it, but not the end of the world.
Today I started thinking about the cool
lookback features of the original
fluid.ampslice~ had, and how those can be used with the separate objects now.
Now, it’s (very(!)) possible that I didn’t understand how that was meant to work in the original version, but my understanding is that, for a bit of extra latency, you could be more certain of where the transient/attack happened. Is that about right?
If so, how does one re-combine the two objets back together in order to do that?
----------begin_max5_patcher---------- 785.3ocwVs0bhBCE9Y8WASdVc3V.69j+O1YmcBP.RMlvlDT6zo829lKhEuTq K1g8EI4vANmuKdHuNcBHiuGKAd+v6mdSl75zISrgLAlbX+DvFz9bJRZSCHy4 M32Ayb2h0tg2pnXk8l9GhRJroxydddRWlMHUdMgU8aANW4JXXzxE9y7hRSMW Bh7Odw6We79IrtWenI1aSmZ9Y1c1tL7Ncaz0DJ7dasAkzVRwBzllJjB+t2Jg dYaiWfaUAeGyrVWaIkjioXVkp1KNNv2aEurTUKvxZNsvyegNMNqe.n2pZRUc itCJE3+34ectJ7RtB1koKM0KMXGQAjjJFhBl4A.GolaPngPykjXKuFF9Y7Yv .3y+Q4O5FxOLbAzzdv+epuUce+LAaoVjKobtvadpVLKQR0A6QucVKRXnuNjj x2cHAmCoKfMGWnybRg9wKO02D.OyYEbz2PILbNuko5aa9RyT32jYJHI1bABe xZsfemloLaYwhtVcKAuaKQRxHTh5E6asCDkkR7gFatsglG0qSn7703hBApRl K3TZe2Xtl2Wq4UdaUc+3XFJihqu7Ab2X6k2HqZCu.eRDtnP298hbptz09LzF 6yAJva3RsVVrPSDZzCtT3R+Jg6HpQhpCitAqJITrQRyDsxZrbAhTZ1tR6iaz KBLq2xMpt+cH5wI1IGAVMe4Sell6O.MGoThVB3lzUO13i+FbAcba2ap0kDlZ gP.z+KFE1Qo5tyU6d+WDLBvL3wfIDNPXxFUTFMLTFG+j8SECEktoyiA.ieL. NT2Z2WaFCHBGFDSBReHMTOHaMpFiFEeZxigwgJiFLlgxW2Gh1G0dFfyNlts9 l3mha8WWD4cca2nkdC8KvREggTDNqWRPWNWkZu6B4OREBdG0I4anNg2Od5rK GONviwjQikjEOVEBNVEJYjJz8XNhtt4H3gJb5cT3vK.naLBpoYKVHOjrsD5A kOyss0xY1sDlaqc5DPfMGH2kejMBRnG6ozy7ZEtyztOw8UOf4zwBldNqCiZv M0b7a8PXy4ekMHGNrypm91z+Brs5reC -----------end_max5_patcher-----------
I can picture doing it with the “half and half” version I posted above, where you feed the differential into
fluid.ampgate~, but then it’s going through another envelope follower and thresholding stage, which has to have some kind of impact on the signal.
So in short, the two things I don’t understand how to do after the creation of
- How to have a gate output from an incoming signal based on the differential algorithm from
fluid.ampslice~without having to “half and half” things.
- How can you leverage the single-sample-spike output of
fluid.ampslice~but with the