Looking for a SuperCollider Windows user to run a very quick test

tremblap · August 28, 2025, 6:30pm

Hello

I would need someone who is using FluCoMa on a Windows machine (no emulation, a real Windows 11 machine) to check that something is really broken or not…

help?

heretogo · August 29, 2025, 9:39pm

I have a spare Windows machine. I can check it tonight

tremblap · August 31, 2025, 8:12am

oh ok here is the code. On Mac and Linux it gives me this:

on the latest SC and Win11 it gives me this:

The question is that on an old version of SC and/or Win, does it look that bad. I cannot believe we let that through for so long so my hypothesis is that something changed…

I am still waiting for a hardware that would allow me to run 4 partitions (new and old Win, now and old ubuntu)…

github.com/flucoma/flucoma-sc

test/FluidWaveform%20raster%20scratch%20paper.scd

main

(
~normalize = {
	arg vals;
	var min = vals.minItem;
	var max = vals.maxItem;
	var range = max - min;

	"min:   %".format(min).postln;
	"max:   %".format(max).postln;
	"range: %".format(range).postln;

	vals = (vals - min) / range;
	vals = (vals * 255).asInteger;
	vals;
};

~dbs_range = {
	arg vals;
	vals.postln;
	vals = vals / vals.maxItem;

This file has been truncated. show original

heretogo · September 28, 2025, 3:43pm

My output looks very similar to yours:

I tried on SuperCollider 3.13 and 3.14, flucoma-sc 1.0.9 and Windows 11 Home (24H2, 26100.4652).

tremblap · September 28, 2025, 4:45pm

that means I’ve dropped the ball for a long time - or it never worked. I’ll do some investigations with very old SC when i get that machine up and running, thanks for the confirmation.

tremblap · November 14, 2025, 8:25am

ok fixed in the nightlies. @heretogo if you have a chance to check it is just not my machine that is working, but I’m 99.9% certain it is fixed