Before filing a proper bug report on git, I want to check here in case I’m overlooking something.
But it seems like @padding 0
in fluid.bufloudness~
isn’t working properly?
According to the reference:
No padding - The first analysis window starts at time 0, and the samples at either end will be tapered by the STFT windowing function.
This leads me to believe that it would still be more than one frame of analysis (for most settings).
In this example with @hopsize 64
and @numframes 1024 @windowsize 1024
, having @padding 0
returns a single frame/channel of analysis.
----------begin_max5_patcher----------
725.3ocuVkrTiCCD8ryWgJcNwkV75bJ+GSMEkrsRvfijKaYH.E7sORsbBgYB
AGHvEszpU+zq2reZV.tPuU1iQ+B8aTPvSyBB.QNAAi6CvaDaKaD8fZ3hAiQq
vy8GoF1nGLMRCbHcTpWj4gVo2x3BgZMF8mwiaElxqqUqupSVZ7ZjjFRliRIt
QVztw82ntBvVWbyhb7dqzI1HMxtqjJQQC.E40mUsZ+qxI64YybCymHKsFnP1
cbVxdOVhmOYlxRntoXOgYGmpo+LTUduErcPYjagGJ9wFTiT8I7.Sg8TXhmdJ
1ywGigrOAC2H66Eqk+GEWPogLzBJILiyyh4vx3znbRDrjDyo7Xzh7vbXLkSR
nQvJVRTVhaURdLwcS6JddB2aCBIMIK2aNNg4tiEpTNmvcR4gjrLdDGVxyyXw
YvxTVFKwI0l5yhi4Nowgznbd9dmQSsRVpGT.C3mWU3IiLzb5gglbXJJ+chMo
Wrfy6j9spYntJrXXEqot2blsafq7wogzTNz0gcxzP92MUsjbkr6EzMZ05FYu
e9gPQ8pyr5aUiVXlTSnnX5AN.5oKDo3u4VM6i0M5gJksX8EzRKVkWKT8HJZ4
80pJ8880OJQTBKBszZzCjEQxSPKuV2B6Rrma5FjsRwsHBXnUttm8i2sUTUYc
Fti5kMVOBZGpnkEM5xacGZAsWOzUJ2ETNZ4G6ao4Hkl.eZfAgHd7wCJrKVPQ
XrtqZ7krUBEpnR84XYwmL4hb9ejaTn6gC1YLjhOf7.TPz5e94F345j+VOhOZ
ORtwey.85CtR1apUBSs8OedUGlWmi5ymJNt1KeHPt1s1bxcJo6pj.yI+.P+F
c1iL8qg7D.N8B3bYSgf7K.Ptr3OQ5hOKUz1dmrqeTY.CaE5MZvQmMG1Vq7aS
fscx6p2oOThfEc1hPisBbnCdW3sIQX+U01PlxVf6iZV1YgDp9UtthsBOQflD
ydd1egSuXmA
-----------end_max5_patcher-----------