Ways to test the validity/usefulness/salience of your data

Nor should they. It’s the fact that the subsequent object interprets fittransform u35235353523 0.8385385 as a message that contains two dataset names.

Screenshot 2022-05-16 at 2.50.13 pm


----------begin_max5_patcher----------
1069.3ocuX1siahCFF93jqBKTOLMx+fA68n89XUUkSvIkYIlHvzNsUct1WiM
IyLaIDW3aFMRCBiIu9we+Z945UI6peT2lf9Kz+fVs5mqWsxOT+.qFteUxI0i
6qTs9okbR21pNpS1DdlU+n0O9gRqsQYZOT2bB0wYDLNEmyQ3sbIiH3Wdg5Na
k1Z+9YcP0jDzmFdzYkc+WJMG+biduM7TFiuEuAkIw8WnTQ3xV70Wxzcpz39E
8qN5yCFzwOJYXzxB+Jsd2CejHR5G6WqW2+uMQxtQ+M2K+6nW0UVr87d0S2Fx
M2ATJM.ZpzeAOMmjQ4jNBmYygyaYiOpsF0I87LkAxR4dz3bnLjbvMj65NPqJ
as2DS+Cmzqkl1imKFn+RNEJVwPZL2WoUMyLpLWtk63KKfIT1RIj3ctozXmGd
DxKcUYPY9xmCd65r1ZSx0EaiK9ypa9r1n1U4oAeKF2oLGmlyf8KOjTM8x++S
R4LBlPFP5JnTTeB4pkfw2zV1ami.SRl2PJx.xbx.jyteTh3Sfn2Tt44qwh7f
ib9bPlMRBHvy01ZcVXUSQ4Oz.T7jDnFyfp5INEbhMt9iTUvvanqHIX3lQADW
WYzC5lmPsFUiF8Ps4X022pJObSrOTUqrW8xmr9Sn8ARfbBUB0F.iCYIHmyci
8PeFazGHaPgf2YUPJDNSwzPTMCpFJXoPx6qNBvGHyi0AeadtGRAX8VfgrrjS
KMZ5VgiLFlyxBgxygyQbgEYfyYHPdAjJ8Hlh88YjiAhTlDPROq1+uHUQw4ZW
oUT4cYNhn0g1GIbxz.yhtgCHOypEsy8WUzcbDCwLtLJhIw1uACzSuhWzgcFb
eo9afn8QH6ebecmwNg+p+nPCgpQz9HkgCQrY8vlcGyIeTjSGAYxawY0OTorV
sYAsScw8kh2xv44XpPJj4RhH20bETeIFZN3vWnrpVsc4jmJ8AtBv9pSouEFZ
W6T11kCKUv1xRcmUHmJEBBUjk4PmATUIBi9VvdUcWgwkW6Ize2V20rWGZqd4
aFozsRZuWeJN04Ff4o88UClS+K2K7+VIUkl++Gb1u75G+0aPAPG.5xww1fdd
MUnaskFksr17xYkElznVgXkx0tXDJcY8rHotrdmVJgaRjqSptovksu+i+7NH
s6TgubVW0lrLseEP2PZND6u7XfDBKo7OPHX2LiQYWCGipLdwlw6pL.6sQYDA
PGZL5vnP3WxhIaFDJk+dE.vhZyCjjlrXLTzbHjJMhLUBHJ5PiwPwfPIVTgsC
0bVlRw3S3WNzkpTVD1IFD4HXYwt6AhRz6ojDBkDuaIIjwt6sTOBQL1oKc58a
MppNe9q5l1gY6Ew0y9C09hlhM9aKMga8e6hjF8WKuLeeKxIpFWe2VWS2cM9E
VxiYoIgWs1U90zUNT62gmSR+4A5+rhsmUAR7GaX8uV+e.7pEtpA
-----------end_max5_patcher-----------

Ah right, got you, this is still about the slice

Yup, just the small slice thing…

slice

So based on the points raised in the thread about fit vs fittransform and chaining, perhaps the variance should be moved to a separate message altogether? (e.g. variance or something descriptive like that). This would make fit chain-able, add parity between fit and fittransform, and more importantly, remove any accidental chaining/loops if what you want to do is query the variance only.

5 posts were split to a new topic: Making a well-sampled MFCC space for audio querying